Papers
arxiv:2608.14943

Skill Blocks: How Should an Agent Load Its Skill? A Caching-Correct Comparison of Pre-load, On-Demand Tool-Loading, Progressive Disclosure, and Hybrid

Published on Aug 14
Authors:

Abstract

Conditional loading of agent skills reduces token usage substantially for large multi-turn tasks without degrading quality, though benefits vary by task.

Agent skills are often injected in full on every request, increasing token cost. We compare four content-preserving loading methods: Full, Skill Block, Reference, and Hybrid. Across SearchQA, SpreadsheetBench, ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, and SynthProc, we measure token usage using raw input for single-turn tasks and cache-correct effective input for multi-turn tasks. Results show no universal winner. Hybrid reduces input by 27.4% on SearchQA and 39.8% on SpreadsheetBench. On large multi-turn skills, Skill Block and Hybrid achieve substantial reductions, reaching 62.5% and 52.8% on ScienceWorld and 73.0% and 66.6% on SynthProc. ALFWorld shows smaller gains because procedures are short and repeatedly needed. Paired outcome tests detect no quality differences, though they do not establish equivalence. Overall, conditional loading is most beneficial when large portions of a skill are not needed on every turn.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.14943
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.14943 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.14943 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.14943 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.