On the Opportunities and Challenges of Prefill-to-Autoregressive Cross-Model Transfer
Abstract
Prefill-to-Autoregressive Cross-model Transfer (PACT), a form of latent communication between language models, combines a larger model's prompt representations with a smaller model's efficient generation, offering a promising way to balance capability and inference cost. However, existing systems provide limited support for independently evaluating large-small model collaboration, and improved task performance alone does not establish whether the receiver benefits from the sender's information. We introduce PLatour, an open-source PACT framework that connects frozen models through lightweight, zero-initialized linear bridges trained directly with task rewards and supports hybrid-attention architectures. PLatour significantly outperforms open-source baselines on generation tasks and surpasses Mostik's reported results on shared mathematics and coding benchmarks using a substantially smaller sender. However, controlled experiments show that the gains on some tasks can be reproduced by uninformative sender signals, self-communication, or receiver-only training. We find that trainable bridges can act as parameter-efficient adaptation mechanisms without exploiting useful sender information. We therefore propose PACT-Check to quantify how much of a trained PACT system's gain genuinely comes from communication. Finally, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of PACT systems. Code is available at https://github.com/zhenyi4/platour.
Community
How much can a small model benefit from a larger model that only processes the prompt—and what actually drives the improvement?
We explore these questions in this new paper.
In prefill-to-autoregressive cross-model transfer (PACT), a larger sender processes the prompt and passes internal representations to a smaller receiver, which then generates the response independently.
We introduce PLatour, a simple and scalable framework that connects frozen models through lightweight linear bridges trained directly with reinforcement learning. It also supports hybrid-attention architectures.
On generation tasks, PLatour substantially outperforms the evaluated open-source PACT baselines. Using a 35B sender, it also exceeds Mostik AI’s reported results on shared math and coding benchmarks, compared with Mostik's 753B sender—although the training setups may differ.
But stronger benchmark results do not, by themselves, establish useful information transfer.
On some tasks, replacing sender representations with question-independent signals or training the receiver alone reproduces much of the improvement. Trainable bridges can provide substantial adaptation capacity even when both model backbones are frozen.
The evidence is task-dependent: controls nearly match PLatour on GSM8K, while PLatour retains gains beyond all tested controls on Chemistry with chain-of-thought generation.
To examine this systematically, we introduce PACT-Check. It combines interventions on sender information with separately trained adaptation baselines. PACT-Score measures the accuracy margin over the strongest applicable control.
Our takeaway: PACT shows promising performance, but understanding its benefits requires distinguishing useful sender information from gains achievable through adaptation.
We hope PLatour and PACT-Check help the community investigate when prefill-only communication helps—and how to make those benefits more reliable.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Growing and Transferring Pathways for LLM Reinforcement Learning (2026)
- OPMD: On-Policy Mechanism Distillation Beyond Output Supervision (2026)
- Enhancing Diffusion Language Models with Autoregressive Post-Training Weights (2026)
- SAPD: Step-Aligned Privileged Distillation (2026)
- OPDArena: Understanding Learning and Forgetting in On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- A Stronger Teacher Within: Strengthening MoE Models via On-Policy Bidirectional Distillation (2026)
- Activation-Conditioned Self-Distillation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2611.06976 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 30
zen-E/PLatour-SFT-Qwen3-235B-to-1.7B-MMLU-Redux
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper