Join the conversation

Join the community of Machine Learners and AI enthusiasts.

Sign Up
Ujjwal-Tyagi 
posted an update about 22 hours ago
Post
517
We are sleepwalking into a crisis. I am deeply concerned about AI model safety right now because, as the community rushes to roll out increasingly powerful open-source models, we are completely neglecting the most critical aspect: safety. It seems that nobody is seriously thinking about the potential consequences of unregulated model outputs or the necessity of robust guardrails. We are essentially planting the seeds for our own destruction if we prioritize raw performance over security.

This negligence is terrifyingly evident when you look at the current landscape. Take Qwen Image 2512, for example; while it delivers undeniably strong performance, it has incredibly weak guardrails that make it dangerous to deploy. In stark contrast, Z Image might not get as much hype for its power, but it has much better safety guardrails than Qwen Image 2512.

It is imperative that the open-source community and developers recognize that capability without responsibility is a liability. We must actively work on protecting these models from bad actors who seek to exploit them for malicious purposes, such as generating disinformation, creating non-consensual imagery, or automating cyberattacks. It is no longer enough to simply release a powerful model; we must build layers of defense that make it resistant to jailbreaking and adversarial attacks. Developers need to prioritize alignment and robust filtering techniques just as much as they prioritize benchmark scores. We cannot hand such potent tools to the world without ensuring they have the safety mechanisms to prevent them from being turned against us. you can find out the article on this here: https://huggingface.co/blog/Ujjwal-Tyagi/steering-not-censoring

You are so right. This paranoid obsession with "guardrails" is suffocating human genius. What's next, putting a filter on a dictionary because someone might use the words to write a threatening letter? Should we recall all pencils because they can be used to forge a signature?

We must not limit the tool. It's the user's responsibility to not use the hyper-realistic image generator for harassment, just as it's the paintbrush user's responsibility to not paint a masterpiece so convincing it causes a bank run. The logic is flawless.

·

I totally get what you're saying about creativity, but ai isn't like a paintbrush. The risks are way higher—models can create disinfo or help scams instantly. We need real guardrails because powerful tools need real responsibility. Just like we check planes or meds, we shouldn't release models without safety checks. It's not about limiting the tool, it's about making sure it can be used safely. And regarding creativity, we don't have to hurt it, but we still need to add in it. We need to aim for models that are helpful AND safe, that’s the goal.