How to use from
vLLM
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip:
pip install vllm
# Start the vLLM server:
vllm serve "Subject-Emu-5259/NeuralAI-Nae1"
# Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API):
curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/completions" \
	-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
	--data '{
		"model": "Subject-Emu-5259/NeuralAI-Nae1",
		"prompt": "Once upon a time,",
		"max_tokens": 512,
		"temperature": 0.5
	}'
Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/Subject-Emu-5259/NeuralAI-Nae1:Q4_K_M
Quick Links
NeuralAI Nae1 banner

NeuralAI β€” Nae1

Trained from scratch. Every weight owned.
A 100M-parameter Llama-style decoder pretrained end-to-end on FineWeb. No distillation, no fine-tune of someone else's base.


Current release: NeuralAI the assistant β€” SFT v8 (step-16000)

Property Value
What it is Instruction-tuned assistant checkpoint with tool use (search, fetch, read_file), built from the NEA1 pretrain line
Base Pretrain step-100000 (the pretrain continued past the step-80000 base release below to step-100000; the SFT line starts there). Same 100.1M architecture
SFT data 8,177 unique rows: 6,500 machine-verified tool traces, 1,265 teacher rows, 400 chat, 12 identity
Training Full SFT on Kaggle T4, LR peak 5e-6 cosine; step-16000 selected from the 20,000-step run by the gate below
Golden-40 tool-use gate 32.5/40 (81.2%) β€” PASS (bar 60%). Tool calls 36/40, grounded answers 29/40. Report: evals/eval_sftv8_step16000_golden40.json
Fluency guardrail PPL 59.26 on a 50-doc guardrail set vs 47.59 for the step-100000 base on the same set (evals/eval_sftv8_step16000_ppl50_n512.json). This is a different, smaller set than the 2000-doc set used below β€” the numbers are not comparable across sets. The fluency cost is this release's known trade-off; closing it is the v9 program
Weights in this repo sft_v8_step16000/ (safetensors f32, config, tokenizer with chat template)
Serving Production since 2026-10-21: Render nae1-inference serves the bf16 copy sft_v8_step16000_bf16/ (native PyTorch, CPU)
Chat template Ships in sft_v8_step16000/tokenizer_config.json. Turns are User: ... / NeuralAI: ...; the generation prompt ends NeuralAI: with no trailing space (see the SFT section for why)

Base release: step-80000 (v2 lineage)

Property Value
Architecture Llama-style decoder: RoPE, GQA, SwiGLU
Parameters 100,111,872 (100.1M)
Layers / hidden / heads 12 layers Β· 768 hidden Β· 12 heads Β· 4 KV heads (GQA)
Vocabulary 32,000 tokens, ByteLevel BPE v2 (tokenizer_v2/)
Context Trained at 2,048; evaluated at n_ctx=512
Training 80,000 steps. Resumed 60,000 β†’ 80,000 on Kaggle T4, peak LR 6e-4, cosine to a 10% floor
Held-out perplexity 54.60 native f32 (2000 docs, 1,454,064 tokens, n_ctx=512)
GGUF f32 / Q4_K_M 55.19 / 55.88 on the same 2000 docs (llama.cpp scoring, token counts differ slightly, see below)
Weights in this repo ckpt_v7_step80000_bf16/ (safetensors, former serving copy β€” production moved to SFT v8 on 2026-10-21) + tokenizer_v2/. GGUF Q4_K_M: nae1-step80000-Q4_K_M.gguf
License Apache 2.0

Lineage note. The v1 run (439-token vocab, 32k steps) is kept below for history. The v2 run rebuilt the tokenizer at 32k and continued training to step 80000. These are different lineages. Do not compare the v1 numbers (for example 54.16) with the v2 numbers. The v2 eval is on the 2000-doc held-out set (evals/).


Training

v2 continuation. Training resumed at step 60,000 and ran to step 80,000. The chart shows the logged train loss and the in-training held-out PPL. The in-training PPL uses a chunked stream protocol and is not the 54.60 number. It is shown only to illustrate the trend.

Nae1 step 60000 to 80000 training loss and in-training held-out PPL

v1 lineage (frozen). Eight cosine cycles from random initialization, 0 β†’ 32,000 steps. with the tokenizer and objective described in the lineage note above.


Evaluation

All v2 claims use one shared held-out corpus: heldout_fineweb.jsonl (2,000 docs from unseen crawl CC-MAIN-2014-10), n_ctx=512. Documents are scored independently in n_ctx windows.

Held-out perplexity lineage: bars on different eval protocols are not directly comparable

Model / format Held-out PPL Tokens Eval report
step-80000, native f32 54.60 1,454,064 evals/eval_base80000_native_n512.json
step-80000, GGUF f32 55.19 (+1.1%) 1,454,478 evals/eval_stablelm_base80000_f32_full.json
step-80000, GGUF Q4_K_M 55.88 (+2.3%) 1,454,478 evals/eval_base80000_stablelm_Q4_K_M_n512.json
step-2000 SFT (sweep candidate, not released) 59.43 (worse than base) 1,454,064 evals/eval_sftv3b_lr1e-5_rp10_2000_native_n512.json

Protocol caveats.

  • The native number is torch teacher-forced scoring. The GGUF numbers use llama.cpp llm.eval scoring. The two runs do not produce identical token counts (1,454,064 vs 1,454,478), so the +1.1% and +2.3% gaps mix the GGUF approximation with scoring differences.
  • The GGUF export drops the LayerNorm bias tensors to fit llama.cpp's RMSNorm. This is a measured approximation, not an exact conversion. Logits do not match the native forward pass exactly.
  • The probe "The quick brown fox" (3 tokens) scores 67,746 PPL. That is noise on a 3-token sequence. Held-out PPL is the metric.

Withdrawn figures. Earlier revisions of this card cited 52.26, 57.64 and 43.09 for step-80000 and step-60000. No saved eval report backs them, so they have been removed. The 43.09 figure came from the in-training chunked protocol and is not comparable to 54.60.

Lineage (historical, different tokenizer)

Checkpoint (v1 lineage, 439-token vocab) Held-out PPL (Q4_K_M, 992 docs, n512)
step-32000 54.16

Earlier v1 steps (8k–28k) were scored on an older eval path and are not comparable.

The v1 cross-check on unseen CC-MAIN-2014-10 (300 docs) gave 57.09 at step-32000 vs 143.64 at step-28000. That confirmed the step-32000 drop was real generalization rather than leakage. It is a v1 number and does not apply to v2.


SFT: from base to assistant

The gate is golden-40: 40 held-out tasks whose facts exist only inside each task's tool-result block, so a grounded answer cannot come from pretraining memory. Scoring: 0.5 for a correct tool call, 0.5 for an answer containing the fact. Bar: at least 60% and strictly better than the base model, which scores 3.0/40 with 0/40 tool calls.

Version Score Calls Grounded Guardrail PPL (50-doc) Outcome
v5 3.5/40 0/40 7/40 50.09 Fail β€” the data taught an answer template instead of reading tool results
v6 13.0/40 0/40 26/40 49.93 Fail β€” grounded answers learned, calls never emitted
v7 12.5/40 0/40 25/40 79.19 Fail β€” calls never emitted; LR 2e-5 blew the fluency guardrail
v8 step-20000 32.0/40 35/40 29/40 59.73 Pass
v8 step-16000 (released) 32.5/40 36/40 29/40 59.26 Pass β€” selected

Root cause of the v5–v7 zero calls, proven at token level. The training kernel's assistant-span mask started after the space in NeuralAI: , but the ByteLevel tokenizer fuses that space and the following Β» into a single token (id 4776) β€” so the first token of every tool call was excluded from the loss in every run, and the models learned the call body conditional on a first token that was never trained. v8 fixes the span, carries a pre-flight assertion (junction token supervised in 7,161 of 7,161 tool traces, confirmed in the training log), and ends the generation prompt at NeuralAI: so it tokenizes as a true prefix of the training format. The shipped chat template uses the same junction.

Tool protocol. The assistant emits a call line β€” Β» search("query"), Β» fetch("url"), or Β» read_file("path"). The host executes the call, returns the result block into the transcript, and the assistant answers from the returned text.

Known limitations. General prose is still rough at 100M parameters, and SFT cost fluency on general text (the guardrail column above). Calls saturate by step-16000 while the fluency cost is already present, so v9 targets the gap with FineWeb replay mixing and a shorter schedule rather than more steps.


Quickstart

The GGUF is a llama.cpp model file. The perplexity numbers above were scored with the exact ByteLevel BPE v2 token IDs from tokenizer_v2/. For exact token IDs, use the tokenizer files in this repo.

from llama_cpp import Llama

llm = Llama(model_path="nae1-step80000-Q4_K_M.gguf", n_ctx=512, verbose=False)
out = llm("The quick brown fox", max_tokens=32, temperature=0.0)
print(out["choices"][0]["text"])

The GGUF quickstart above loads the pretrained base (step-80000), which has no chat template. For the assistant, use sft_v8_step16000/ with the chat template in its tokenizer_config.json.


Files

  • sft_v8_step16000/: current assistant release (SFT v8) β€” safetensors f32 + tokenizer with chat template
  • sft_v8_step16000_bf16/: bf16 serving copy of the assistant release (what production runs)
  • nae1-step80000-Q4_K_M.gguf: base GGUF (Q4_K_M, 76.6 MiB)
  • ckpt_v7_step80000_bf16/: serving safetensors checkpoint
  • tokenizer_v2/: 32k ByteLevel BPE tokenizer used by step-80000
  • evals/: the eval JSON reports behind every number on this card
  • nae1-llama-Q4_K_M.gguf, nae1-llama-f32.gguf, eval_step*_q4_n512.json, ckpt_v7_step60000*, tokenizer/: v1 lineage history, kept for reference
Downloads last month
2,128
GGUF
Model size
76.2M params
Architecture
llama
Hardware compatibility
Log In to add your hardware

4-bit

32-bit

Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ 1 Ask for provider support