Datasets:
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
1K - 10K
Tags:
open-science
superconductivity
superconductor-discovery
strongly-correlated
materials-discovery
2d-materials
License:
OSC open discovery: Ag2S2, Fe2I2S2, I2Ru2, Co2Te2, OsBr2, FeCl2 — candidates under corrected filling (#15)
#17
by 1Dmeds - opened
submissions/1Dmeds_OSC-00416.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"author": "1Dmeds",
|
| 3 |
+
"material_id": "2AgS-3",
|
| 4 |
+
"osc_id": "OSC-00416",
|
| 5 |
+
"formula": "Ag2S2",
|
| 6 |
+
"method_name": "QE PBE SCF (6x6x1 k, pslibrary PAW) + OSC downfold.py, filling delta=|1-2f| (see #15)",
|
| 7 |
+
"provisional_score": 25.9,
|
| 8 |
+
"nef": 1.475,
|
| 9 |
+
"band_filling_per_spin": 0.375,
|
| 10 |
+
"delta_corrected": 0.25,
|
| 11 |
+
"score_current_pipeline": 20.0,
|
| 12 |
+
"track": "open",
|
| 13 |
+
"note": "New material outside the active set. Scored under the corrected filling convention discussed in #15 (per-spin band filling f, delta=|1-2f|); score_current_pipeline is the value under the present downfold.py. Band choice: the E_F-crossing band closest to half filling. Non-magnetic C2DB metal. N(E_F) from our SCF runs ~3% above organizer values on 48 anchors."
|
| 14 |
+
}
|
submissions/1Dmeds_OSC-00524.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"author": "1Dmeds",
|
| 3 |
+
"material_id": "2CoTe-1",
|
| 4 |
+
"osc_id": "OSC-00524",
|
| 5 |
+
"formula": "Co2Te2",
|
| 6 |
+
"method_name": "QE PBE SCF (6x6x1 k, pslibrary PAW) + OSC downfold.py, filling delta=|1-2f| (see #15)",
|
| 7 |
+
"provisional_score": 23.1,
|
| 8 |
+
"nef": 1.314,
|
| 9 |
+
"band_filling_per_spin": 0.631,
|
| 10 |
+
"delta_corrected": 0.262,
|
| 11 |
+
"score_current_pipeline": 5.0,
|
| 12 |
+
"track": "open",
|
| 13 |
+
"note": "New material outside the active set. Scored under the corrected filling convention discussed in #15 (per-spin band filling f, delta=|1-2f|); score_current_pipeline is the value under the present downfold.py. Non-magnetic C2DB metal. N(E_F) from our SCF runs ~3% above organizer values on 48 anchors."
|
| 14 |
+
}
|
submissions/1Dmeds_OSC-00600.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"author": "1Dmeds",
|
| 3 |
+
"material_id": "2FeIS-1",
|
| 4 |
+
"osc_id": "OSC-00600",
|
| 5 |
+
"formula": "Fe2I2S2",
|
| 6 |
+
"method_name": "QE PBE SCF (6x6x1 k, pslibrary PAW) + OSC downfold.py, filling delta=|1-2f| (see #15)",
|
| 7 |
+
"provisional_score": 24.2,
|
| 8 |
+
"nef": 1.448,
|
| 9 |
+
"band_filling_per_spin": 0.587,
|
| 10 |
+
"delta_corrected": 0.174,
|
| 11 |
+
"score_current_pipeline": 0,
|
| 12 |
+
"track": "open",
|
| 13 |
+
"note": "New material outside the active set. Scored under the corrected filling convention discussed in #15 (per-spin band filling f, delta=|1-2f|); score_current_pipeline is the value under the present downfold.py. Non-magnetic C2DB metal. N(E_F) from our SCF runs ~3% above organizer values on 48 anchors."
|
| 14 |
+
}
|
submissions/1Dmeds_OSC-01953.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"author": "1Dmeds",
|
| 3 |
+
"material_id": "1FeCl2-2",
|
| 4 |
+
"osc_id": "OSC-01953",
|
| 5 |
+
"formula": "Cl2Fe",
|
| 6 |
+
"method_name": "QE PBE SCF (6x6x1 k, pslibrary PAW) + OSC downfold.py, filling delta=|1-2f| (see #15)",
|
| 7 |
+
"provisional_score": 39.1,
|
| 8 |
+
"nef": 2.226,
|
| 9 |
+
"band_filling_per_spin": 0.633,
|
| 10 |
+
"delta_corrected": 0.266,
|
| 11 |
+
"score_current_pipeline": 8.5,
|
| 12 |
+
"track": "open",
|
| 13 |
+
"note": "New material outside the active set. Scored under the corrected filling convention discussed in #15 (per-spin band filling f, delta=|1-2f|); score_current_pipeline is the value under the present downfold.py. Caveat: C2DB lists this material as magnetic; our SCF is non-spin-polarized, so N(E_F) may be overestimated (same eligibility question as #12). N(E_F) from our SCF runs ~3% above organizer values on 48 anchors."
|
| 14 |
+
}
|
submissions/1Dmeds_OSC-02088.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"author": "1Dmeds",
|
| 3 |
+
"material_id": "2IRu-1",
|
| 4 |
+
"osc_id": "OSC-02088",
|
| 5 |
+
"formula": "I2Ru2",
|
| 6 |
+
"method_name": "QE PBE SCF (6x6x1 k, pslibrary PAW) + OSC downfold.py, filling delta=|1-2f| (see #15)",
|
| 7 |
+
"provisional_score": 24.1,
|
| 8 |
+
"nef": 1.371,
|
| 9 |
+
"band_filling_per_spin": 0.642,
|
| 10 |
+
"delta_corrected": 0.284,
|
| 11 |
+
"score_current_pipeline": 5.2,
|
| 12 |
+
"track": "open",
|
| 13 |
+
"note": "New material outside the active set. Scored under the corrected filling convention discussed in #15 (per-spin band filling f, delta=|1-2f|); score_current_pipeline is the value under the present downfold.py. Non-magnetic C2DB metal. N(E_F) from our SCF runs ~3% above organizer values on 48 anchors."
|
| 14 |
+
}
|
submissions/1Dmeds_OSC-02308.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"author": "1Dmeds",
|
| 3 |
+
"material_id": "1OsBr2-3",
|
| 4 |
+
"osc_id": "OSC-02308",
|
| 5 |
+
"formula": "Br2Os",
|
| 6 |
+
"method_name": "QE PBE SCF (6x6x1 k, pslibrary PAW) + OSC downfold.py, filling delta=|1-2f| (see #15)",
|
| 7 |
+
"provisional_score": 39.4,
|
| 8 |
+
"nef": 2.355,
|
| 9 |
+
"band_filling_per_spin": 0.585,
|
| 10 |
+
"delta_corrected": 0.17,
|
| 11 |
+
"score_current_pipeline": 0,
|
| 12 |
+
"track": "open",
|
| 13 |
+
"note": "New material outside the active set. Scored under the corrected filling convention discussed in #15 (per-spin band filling f, delta=|1-2f|); score_current_pipeline is the value under the present downfold.py. Caveat: C2DB lists this material as magnetic; our SCF is non-spin-polarized, so N(E_F) may be overestimated (same eligibility question as #12). N(E_F) from our SCF runs ~3% above organizer values on 48 anchors."
|
| 14 |
+
}
|