The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Exception: SplitsNotFoundError
Message: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 81, in _split_generators
first_examples = list(islice(pipeline, self.NUM_EXAMPLES_FOR_FEATURES_INFERENCE))
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 32, in _get_pipeline_from_tar
fs: fsspec.AbstractFileSystem = fsspec.filesystem("memory")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/fsspec/registry.py", line 302, in filesystem
cls = get_filesystem_class(protocol)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/fsspec/registry.py", line 239, in get_filesystem_class
raise ValueError(f"Protocol not known: {protocol}")
ValueError: Protocol not known: memory
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 66, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
for split in get_dataset_split_names(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
path=dataset,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
config_name=config,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
token=hf_token,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
info = get_dataset_config_info(
path,
...<6 lines>...
**config_kwargs,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
π¦ Assistax Zoo
A population of pre-trained partner policies for Assistax, a multi-agent hardware-accelerated reinforcement learning benchmark for assistive robotics. Each "human" in the zoo is a policy trained with its own sampled preferences over how it likes to be assisted β how fast the robot should move, how much contact force it should apply, how much unexpected touching it tolerates. Together they form the partner pool for zero-shot coordination (ZSC) and ad-hoc teamwork (AHT) experiments, where a robot has to work with partners it has never trained against.
| π Paper | Assistax: A Multi-Agent Hardware-Accelerated Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Assistive Robotics (Reinforcement Learning Journal, 2026) |
| π» Code | assistive-autonomy/assistax |
| βοΈ License | Apache 2.0 |
| π¦ Contents | zoo.tar.gz (~728 MB) |
π₯ The population
- 630 unique humans per task, split evenly across three training algorithms: 210 IPPO, 210 MAPPO, 210 MASAC.
- Agents are saved in teams. A team is one robot and one human trained together in the same run; both rows share a
team_uuid. Across all five tasks that is 3,150 human+robot teams, 6,300 agents in total. - Five tasks are covered:
scratchitch,bedbathing,armmanipulation,feeding,teethbrushing. - The
pushcoopandhandoverenvironments are robotβrobot and have no preference rewards, so they have no zoo entries.
Humans within a task are distinguished by their preference weights w_speed, w_force and w_touch, which are sampled per agent β the population is deduplicated on those weights (plus disability settings), so no two humans in a task share an identity.
β¬οΈ Download
The archive is around 728 MB, so give it a moment.
hf download leohink/assistax-zoo zoo.tar.gz --repo-type dataset --local-dir .
tar -xzf zoo.tar.gz
Or without the Hugging Face CLI:
wget https://huggingface.co/datasets/leohink/assistax-zoo/resolve/main/zoo.tar.gz
tar -xzf zoo.tar.gz
Then point Assistax at the extracted zoo/ directory by setting ZOO_PATH in assistax/baselines/ZSC/config/ppo_aht.yaml (or sac_aht.yaml, or crossplay_zoo.yaml), which defaults to ./zoo:
ZOO_PATH: /path/to/zoo
ποΈ Layout
zoo/
index.csv # one row per agent
config/<agent_uuid>.yaml # the full training config for that agent
params/<agent_uuid>.safetensors # flax parameters, flattened with sep='/'
Every agent is identified by a UUID. Its parameters and the config it was trained under live under that same UUID, which is how the library rebuilds the right network for a given checkpoint.
index.csv columns
| Column | Meaning |
|---|---|
agent_uuid |
Unique id; keys into config/ and params/ |
scenario |
Environment name, e.g. scratchitch |
scenario_agent_id |
robot or human |
algorithm |
IPPO, MAPPO or MASAC |
is_rnn |
Whether the policy is recurrent |
rnn_dim |
GRU hidden size when recurrent, else 0 |
team_uuid |
Shared by the robot and human trained together |
w_speed |
Weight on the human's speed preference |
w_force |
Weight on the human's contact-force preference |
w_touch |
Weight on the touch penalty (always negative) |
π What makes each human different
Humans are differentiated by a preference reward that sits on top of the task reward:
- Speed preference β the human has a preferred band for the robot's end-effector speed and is happiest inside it, with Gaussian falloff outside. Band bounds are sampled from roughly 0.03β0.20 m/s.
- Force preference β the same idea for contact force on the body, with bounds sampled from roughly 1.0β5.0 N.
- Action efficiency β smaller, smoother robot actions score higher.
- Touch penalty β a negative weight applied whenever the robot makes a new, unexpected contact.
The positive components are budget-normalised (reward_budget = 1.5 by default), so the maximum preference reward per step is the same for every human regardless of how their individual weights came out β what changes is which behaviour earns it. Full formulas, meta-ranges and sampling mechanics are in assistax/envs/README.md.
One thing to watch when loading these policies: agents trained with preference rewards observe 7 extra preference dimensions on top of the base observation, so their first layer is wider than a vanilla policy for the same environment.
π§βπ» Loading a policy
The library handles the index, the architecture reconstruction and the parameter loading. It is pip-installable straight from GitHub:
# NVIDIA GPU (CUDA 12); use [cuda13] or [cpu] as appropriate
pip install "assistax[cuda12] @ git+https://github.com/assistive-autonomy/assistax.git"
from assistax.wrappers.aht import ZooManager
zoo = ZooManager("/path/to/zoo")
# Pick the humans for one task
humans = zoo.index[
(zoo.index.scenario == "scratchitch")
& (zoo.index.scenario_agent_id == "human")
]
print(len(humans), "humans available")
agent = zoo.load_agent(humans.iloc[0].agent_uuid)
# agent.apply_fn -> flax apply function
# agent.params -> parameter pytree
# agent.hstate_reset_fn -> initial hidden state (None for feed-forward policies)
ZooManager reads config/<uuid>.yaml to decide which network to rebuild β IPPOActorCritic, IPPOActorCriticRNN, MAPPOActor, MAPPOActorRNN or SACActor. The default ff_nps network is a feed-forward actor and critic with 128-unit hidden layers, ReLU activations and no parameter sharing between agents.
If you would rather not depend on Assistax, the parameters are plain safetensors:
import safetensors.flax
from flax.traverse_util import unflatten_dict
flat = safetensors.flax.load_file("zoo/params/<agent_uuid>.safetensors")
params = unflatten_dict(flat, sep="/")
π― Using the zoo for ZSC / AHT
With ZOO_PATH set, train a PPO robot against the pre-trained partner population:
uv run python assistax/baselines/ZSC/ppo_aht.py ENV_NAME=scratchitch
There is a SAC variant too (assistax/baselines/ZSC/sac_aht.py).
The population is split into train and test partners. By default this is a random split controlled by SPLIT_RATIO in the AHT config (0.25 in ppo_aht.yaml, 0.2 in sac_aht.yaml β 0.25 means 25% train, 75% test). Setting EXTREME_SPLIT instead selects partners by how extreme their preferences are, in one of three modes β single (rank on one preference dimension), multi (rank on several independently) or composite (distance from the population centroid) β which is useful for testing generalisation to partners well outside the training distribution.
You can also run crossplay across the whole population to inspect behavioural diversity:
uv run python assistax/baselines/ZSC/crossplay_zoo.py ENV_NAME=scratchitch
ποΈ Tasks
| Task | Description |
|---|---|
Scratch Itch (scratchitch) |
An itch target is sampled on the human's right arm. The robot must reach it and apply a specified force; the human can move their arm to help. |
Bed Bathing (bedbathing) |
52 bathing points are distributed along the human's arm. The robot must wipe each one with sufficient contact force before the episode ends. |
Arm Assist (armmanipulation) |
The human is too weak to lift their arm alone. The robot must align with a section of the arm and move it into a comfortable resting position. |
Feeding (feeding) |
The robot navigates a spoon to the mouth of a human seated in a wheelchair, keeping the spoon correctly oriented, moving at the right speed and making gentle contact. |
Teeth Brushing (teethbrushing) |
The robot approaches the mouth with a toothbrush, aligns the bristles and brushes with an appropriate tangential speed and contact force. |
All tasks are two-agent, built on Brax/MJX with continuous Box(-1, 1) actions and 1000-step episodes.
π License
Apache 2.0, matching the Assistax library.
π Citation
If you use the Assistax zoo in your work, please cite:
@article{hinckeldey2026assistax,
title={Assistax: A Multi-Agent Hardware-Accelerated Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Assistive Robotics},
author={Leonard Hinckeldey and Elliot Fosong and Rimvydas Rubavicius and Elle Miller and Trevor McInroe and Fan Zhang and Patricia Wollstadt and Stefano V. Albrecht and Subramanian Ramamoorthy},
journal={Reinforcement Learning Journal},
volume={7},
pages={},
year={2026}
}
- Downloads last month
- 122